Newsletter...
May/June 2008
  • SCDOT Maintenance Director Meeting Notes
  • Legislative Update
  • Conservation and Growth Can Go Hand In Hand
    SCDOT Maintenance Director Meeting Notes
    The following are notes from the MASC Aggregate Committee's meeting with SCDOT Maintenance Director, Jim Feda:

    Jim Feda’s comments on why granite materials that had previously been used were being replaced with lightweight materials:

  • Availability
    1. Started during the construction of the Ravenel Bridge in ‘03
  • In years past, chip seal had been done in-house by the SCDOT, and was now being done by contractors for cost cutting purposes. This created some problems with application.
  • Politically, due to the use of “other” materials, complaints were being made to the department, and change was being requested.
  • The SCDOT made the change to lightweight based on:
    1. Availability
    2. Modified emulsion to help with loose stone
    3. Cost
    4. Damage claims
    5. Single sized material
    6. Color…constituents felt based upon the looks of the lightweight material they were getting a better product from the SCDOT.

  • The research performed by NC State University concluded that lightweight material performed better than granite materials.

  • Brent Connelly asked if testing had been done on the performance of granite materials

  • The availability issue was discussed and concluded that material is available and the suppliers of the association would look toward supplying a single-sized material

  • Neal Barber made the point that lightweight and granite materials could coexist based upon application needs

  • Todd Stegal noted that a job(s) could be bid with side-by-side application, which Jim agreed with.

  • Jim further mentioned that they plan on doing more chip seal and asphalt paving through the Maintenance Dept.
    1. Chip seal is done on roads that are 500ADT or less, of the states secondary roads, 63% are at or below this requirement. Chip seal is the most cost effective means of road maintenance.
    2. Mentioned future lettings (July-Sept.) that would bid both micro-surfacing and macro-surfacing.

  • Jim said he would meet with Tony Chapman, and get back with the association concerning:
    1. Bidding a job in the near future that specifies either lightweight or granite aggregates, and letting market prices and contractors decide on materials.
    2. Research criteria comparing lightweight vs. granite materials

  • Concerning the bi-annual SCDOT Maintenance Conference, Jim said that he would welcome a presentation by the MASC and would be in touch with us concerning our interest.

    Participants:
    Jim Feda, David Cook, Todd Stegall -SCDOT Maintenance Dept.
    Neal Barber- Hanson Aggregates
    Pat Dwyer, Brent Connelly, Mike O’Shaughnessey- Vulcan Materials Company
    Kelly Smith -MASC
    [Top]

    Legislative Update
    S.428, Senator Hayes A BILL TO AMEND CHAPTER 4, BY REDESIGNATING THE CHAPTER AS THE "SOUTH CAROLINA WATER WITHDRAWAL, PERMITTING,USE, AND REPORTING ACT".
    The bill failed to pass and is dead for the year.

    H.4549, Speaker Harrell Highway Funding - Sales Tax on Vehicles
    The bill passed the House and was sent to the Senate where it was referred the Senate Finance Committee.

    H.4930 Representative G.M. Smith A BILL RELATING TO UNLAWFUL PURCHASE OF COPPER - Copper Theft.
    The bill passed into law.

  • AUTOMATIC STAY ISSUE ON PERMITS (H.3575)
    A compromise was reached on language concerning the automatic stay issue on permits. The following is a summary of the language that can be found in H.3575:

    Revised Subsequent Permit Language:
    If the request is filed for a subsequent license related to issues substantially similar to those considered in a previously licensed matter, the license may not be automatically stayed by the filing of the request. If the requesting party asserts in the request that the issues are not substantially similar to those considered in a previously licensed matter, then the license must be stayed until further order of the Administrative Law Court.

    Revised Time Period Language:
    Upon motion by any party, the court shall lift the stay for good cause shown or if no irreparable harm will occur, then the stay shall be lifted. A hearing must be held within thirty days after the motion is filed with the court and served upon the parties to lift the automatic stay or for a determination of the applicability of the automatic stay. The judge must issue an order no later than fifteen business days after the hearing is concluded.

    If there are any questions concerning the AUTOMATIC STAY ISSUE ON PERMITS please call the MASC Office.

    S.891, Senator McConnell A BILL TO PROVIDE THAT THE SALES, USE, AND CASUAL EXCISE TAX REVENUES IN A FISCAL YEAR FROM THE SALE, USE, OR TITLING OF A VEHICLE REQUIRED TO BE REGISTERED AND LICENSED BY THE SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES MUST BE CREDITED TO THE STATE HIGHWAY FUND AND AN EQUAL AMOUNT OF NONSTATE TAX SOURCE STATE HIGHWAY FUND REVENUES TRANSFERRED TO THE SOUTH CAROLINA TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE BANK TO PROVIDE FOR THE USE OF THESE REVENUES.
    The bill resides in the Senate Finance Committee.

    S.892, Senator Grooms A BILL RELATING TO THE GENERAL FUND AND THE CAPITAL RESERVE FUND, BY ADDING A SECTION,TO ESTABLISH THE TRANSPORTATION MAINTENANCE FUND, TO PROVIDE THAT TWO PERCENT OF THE GENERAL FUND REVENUE OF THE LATEST COMPLETED FISCAL YEAR BE DEPOSITED INTO THE TRANSPORTATION MAINTENANCE FUND, TO PROVIDE THAT MONIES IN THE FUND MUST BE USED TO OFFSET REVENUE SHORTFALLS, AND TO PROVIDE THAT ANY MONIES IN THE FUND AT THE END OF THE FISCAL YEAR MUST BE DEPOSITED IN THE NON-FEDERAL AID HIGHWAY FUND.
    The bill resides in the Senate Finance Committee.

    [Top]

    Conservation and Growth Can Go Hand In Hand
    Perhaps the greatest conservationist to occupy the Oval Office, President Theodore Roosevelt, once said, “Conservation means development as much as it does protection. I recognize the right and duty of this generation to develop and use the natural resources of our land; but I do not recognize the right to waste them, or to rob, by wasteful use, the generations that come after us.”

    Certainly, President Roosevelt was a champion for the great cause of preserving our natural legacy; yet, he also understood that environmental protection and economic growth are not mutually exclusive. In that spirit, we announce the formation of Citizens for Sound Conservation, a group dedicated to both the economic and environmental health of our state.

    From the mountains to the coast and everywhere in between, South Carolinians are blessed with abundant natural resources that help make the Palmetto State a desirable place to visit, live, work, raise a family and retire. In so many respects, our quality of life is second to none — a divine gift subsequently managed and nurtured by generations of Sandlappers.

    Our natural heritage is a gift, but it has not come without responsibilities. Our duty is to ensure clean air and water, preservation of historical and unique places, and proper, responsible stewardship of the resources we have been given. We can meet the obligations of sustaining and improving our quality of life, however, only through a shared commitment to economic development in conjunction with sound conservation of our natural resources.

    Too often in environmental policy debates, we find either/or propositions. Are you for the creation of jobs, or do you instead choose to protect the environment and preserve the health of South Carolinians? Individuals and organizations from both sides of this debate, at times with an assist from the media, have routinely cast these issues as all-or-nothing situations, with win-at-all-cost approaches. Sadly, the jobs that would have been created and the reasonable, effective environmental protections that could have resulted have been lost in the process.

    The time has come for the debate to change — for the focus to be shifted from the question of jobs or the environment to seeking a balance between the prosperity of our communities and the health and sustainability of our environment. As a result, community leaders representing various interests have united to ensure that sound conservation is achieved while promoting the creation of jobs and opportunities for all South Carolinians.

    Over the last several years, we have watched environmental issues move from the science pages of magazines and newspapers to above the fold on the front page, as if these concerns and the pursuit of solutions were new phenomena. Nothing, however, could be further from the truth, as responsible growth and development has been taking place long before this massive green push began.

    Several examples are notable. For decades, the state’s manufacturers have committed to sustainability practices not only because those efforts made good business sense and satisfied government regulators, but also because the men and women who ran these companies valued the preservation of our natural heritage. Concerned citizens in other economic sectors have also contributed to this great goal: The State Ports Authority has worked to enhance on-site air quality; our state’s utilities are aggressively pursuing new technologies that will ensure clean, reliable and affordable energy with a renewed focus on nuclear and other renewable clean power; and realtors and homebuilders have long supported expansion of private incentives to protect historic and environmentally sensitive land.

    Some folks scoff at these efforts, but we ask those naysayers to reconsider their rigid opposition to economic progress. Evidence demonstrates that developed, prosperous communities enjoy much better environmental conditions and a much higher quality of life than do those areas where people struggle to meet basic needs. Uncompromising positions against catalysts for future growth and prosperity such as expanded port facilities or new power plants will not in the long run benefit South Carolina’s economic or environmental health.

    The members of Citizens for Sound Conservation understand that South Carolina must balance good stewardship of our natural resources with job creation. The greatest hope any American can have is the opportunity to realize his or her potential and to do so in a safe, healthy environment. If we do not recognize that prosperity and the protection of our great natural heritage must go hand in hand, we will condemn ourselves and future generations to live in a South Carolina that enjoys neither prosperity nor a clean and healthy environment.

    Lewis Gossett, Free Times Reader and SCMA Director

    [Top]

    If you would like to be removed from this newsletter distribution please email contact@scmines.com