Newsletter...
July 2006
  • A Letter to MASC Members From MASC President Roger Dunlap
  • Review of the 2006 Board Planning Session
  • Good News...We Won!
  • Four Leading ExxonMobil Distributors Consolidate to Form PetroLiance LLC
  • House Approves Bill to Boost Offshore Drilling
    A Letter to MASC Members From MASC President Roger Dunlap
    Dear MASC Member,

    I want to inform you about an important decision made by the Board of Directors of the Mining Association of South Carolina last Saturday. We decided to launch a Workshop in early 2007, which will replace the longstanding spring Mining Conference. This Workshop will be designed to gather the people involved with mining, and inform them on a variety of interesting and pertinent subjects, in a whole new way.

    The Workshop will be held in Columbia, and it will span one afternoon and dinner, through lunch of the following day. The first day will address subjects relating to sales, quality and production, while the second day will be focused on the operations. It will consist of some large group presentations on broader subjects, breakout sessions on more focused topics, many displays by vendors and an ample opportunity for the group to mix and mingle.

    The Board is confident this format will provide several advantages over the previous spring meetings. It will be tailored toward a broader cross section of people, including multiple levels of production personnel as well as sales and quality. We will provide all these groups with information which will make them more knowledgeable and also better equipped to do their jobs. The event will showcase vital topics such as new products and services, ways to operate more efficiently, different approaches to safety and our customers’ changing needs. From the suppliers’ standpoint, the format will offer better contact, with more of the people who actually select and use their various products.

    Please take one moment to let us know approximately how many people from your organization, are likely to attend this workshop. The number you give is only for planning purposes, and not an obligation. You can notify us via return e-mail, regular mail or phone, but we ask that you do so by the end of this week, in order for us to begin arrangements.

    To give you an idea of my plans, Vulcan will encourage all of our South Carolina area production and plant mangers, as well as some foremen, engineers and support persons to participate both days. Persons from the sales side (sales managers, salesmen, quality control manager, some quality technicians, etc.) will attend only the first day.

    The Association is very proud to represent and serve the fine people involved with mining in our State. And we are confident this new workshop will provide real value to all those who participate. [Top]

    Review of the 2006 Board Planning Session
    MINING ASSOCIATION OF SOUTH CAROLINA
    2006 Board Planning Session
    June 15 - 17, 2006
    DoubleTree Guest Suites
    181 Church Street
    Charleston, SC

    Planning Session Notes
    President Dunlap welcomed the members to the 2006 Planning Session and passed out the adjusted agenda. The Anti-Trust statement was reaffirmed. The Planning Session is to develop ideas for the future. Because we spend great deals of time in meetings, we need to make good use of the time to develop action plans for MASC program to be addressed during the coming year.

    Comments

  • Staff at MASC was an important part the organization and had done a good job. Future programs at the mining conference should be geared towards mine operations personnel. It was noted that cost was a concern for conference attendees.
  • The small miner programs have not been successful. The MSHA regional programs were attended by the small mines but did not translate into Association participation.

    Functions Concerns

  • Conference programs have gotten stale and need refurbishing.
  • Attendance at presentations is a problem especially on Saturday morning.
  • Six companies represent 80% of mined products in the state and are the organizations that need to support the association.
  • Functions and programs need to focus on second and third line operating person at the mine.
  • Given the opportunity, company personnel have not chosen to attend the mining conference.
  • Christmas Dinner may serve a purpose.
  • The Annual Meeting is much like the Mining Conference.

    Questions to address as we look at the next 18 months

  • A struggling association
  • Need to increase miner participation at association functions
  • Vendors deal with second and third operator personnel at the mine
  • Relationships are what business is built on in the mining industry

    How can the MASC provide a relationship building opportunity for its members?

  • Develop a workshop
  • Refurbish the Mining Conference and other functions
  • Create teams to represent the different mining professions
  • Use door prizes at educational functions to enlist attendance
  • Modify the annual meeting
  • Conduct the workshop in March following the Georgia Mining Conference
  • Mining Workshop in Columbia at one of the conference centers
  • One and half day program to minimize room cost which is factor in attendance
  • Consider the wide variety of mining professions in SC compared to GA
  • Registration fees would include a nonmember component

    Proposal

  • President Dunlap will take on the task of developing a workshop for the Association. He will appoint a committee composed of: Doug Larson, Doug Glaze and David Dorroh to develop a mining workshop agenda and program to replace the Mining Conference. The workshop will be in Columbia in early March of 2007.
  • The Christmas Dinner will be the responsibility of Anna Barrier.
  • The Annual Meeting will be scheduled for October 6, 2006 in Columbia, possibly at the Columbia Conference Center and will include presentations by Aiken Tech and MSHA. The program will be chaired by Jim Holmes and follow the past annual meeting format.
  • Planning Session for 2007 will be during the third week of July or August in Charleston at the DoubleTree to take advantage of the SEWE rooming arrangement.
  • President Dunlap requested the development of a calendar to include deadline dates for activities.
  • A superior rating was given to Kelly Smith and Associated Services for his performance review for the year 2006.

    Committees

  • The Board reviewed the Committee responsibilities and role of the Committee Chair. It was then proposed that the Board and Committee Chairs meet jointly to review purpose and role of committees to the association.
  • It was also suggested that a training session on parliamentary procedure and running a meeting, be conducted for Committee Chairman.
  • Committee Chairman would be appointed by the Board and serve from annual meeting to annual meeting.
  • An image development funding request for DVD’s will be sent by the Association Office to the membership. Staff will coordinate with Jim McKnight on request letter for funding of the Image Development Program

    Budget

  • The Finance Committee is requested to address a dues adjustment and salary adjustment of staff in the coming year’s budget.

    Recessed [Top]

    Good News...We Won!
    The Supreme Court decided in favor of the MASC position in SCE&G Dam Case. On June 19, 2006 the court's issued an affirmed opinion on the MASC position that the SCE&G quarry at the Lake Murray Dam was a mine and required a mining permit from DHEC.
    [Top]

    Four Leading ExxonMobil Distributors Consolidate to Form PetroLiance LLC
    Four of the nation's largest ExxonMobil Distributors have announced plans to consolidate operations and form a new company, Petroliance LLC. The four companies are Boncosky Oil Company of Chicago; Commercial Ullman Lubricants Company of of Ohio; LUBRICANT TECHNOLOGIES LLC, which is active in North and South Carolina, and Georgia; and Young Oil Company of South Florida.

    By combining the resources of the four companies, PetroLiance will be, by far, the largest ExxonMobil distributorship in each of the markets in which it operates, said Kevin McCarter, speaking on behalf of the new organization. McCarter will serve as Chief Executive Officer.

    PRWeb, Press Release, July, 2006.

    [Top]

    House Approves Bill to Boost Offshore Drilling
    A controversial bill to allow more offshore drilling for oil and natural gas - and pay the states that do - passed the U.S. House on Thursday with voting split largely along party lines. The vote was 232-187. The bill now moves to the U.S. Senate, which is expected to take it up in July.

    The Deep Ocean Energy Resources Act would give individual states the option of overriding the 1981 congressional offshore drilling moratorium, which bans opening new areas of the ocean to drilling. The moratorium was renewed in a bipartisan Congressional vote a few weeks ago.

    The states would have one year to decide whether to permit leases for natural gas drilling from 50 to 100 miles out to sea, and three years to decide whether to allow oil drilling. The bill also would give states a share of the revenue from drilling. It would keep the moratorium in place within 50 miles of the coast.

    Offshore drilling now takes place in the Pacific and off western Gulf of Mexico states. Oil advocates and environmentalists have long warred over expanding that range. That battle heated up earlier this year with pressure by the oil industry as hurricane-battered Gulf Coast state representatives sought a bigger share in federal revenue from the drilling.

    Industry representatives say the need for more oil and gas is vital, and new technology makes it safe. Environmentalists say the pollution risk is too high for an economy built on tourism and fishing, and that cutting back oil and gas consumption would free up as much fuel as drilling would provide.

    Methane deposits off South Carolina suggest natural gas can be found there. Generally, at least some deposit of oil is found wherever natural gas is found.

    Representative Henry Brown added a provision to the bill that 30 percent of the state revenue be distributed among coastal communities within 25 miles of the coast where the drilling occurs, he said.

    "That's a tremendous amount of revenue for the coast of South Carolina," he said. The coast could also expect an economic boom from manufacturers moving to the coast because of the natural gas.

    The bill has the support of South Carolina's two senators, Lindsey Graham and Jim DeMint, and state legislative leaders said the General Assembly would consider whether to allow drilling. Gov. Mark Sanford opposes it.

    Post & Courier, June 30, 2006.

    [Top]

    If you would like to be removed from this newsletter distribution please email contact@scmines.com